第231頁(第2/5 頁)

this later datg is undoubtedly a strong argunt favour of sevcenko&r;s thesis that cabasilas&r;disurse has nothg to do with the zealots

[36]publi射d，with an english translation and ntary，by isevcenko，&l;alexi akrebolites and his&ldo;dialogue beeen the rich and the poor&rdo;&r;zrvi 6（1960），187-228

[37]elegrand，lettres de l&l;epereur anuel paléologue，paris 1893;igne，pg 156，82 ff

[38]a translation of part of this work，fro the vienna ssupplgr75 is given by hhunr，byzantische isteswelt，baden-baden 1958，282-6for the other writgs and rrespondence of john chortasn cfide，&l;zeitschichte der rhetorik des sterbenden byzanz&r;，wiener archiv fschdes slawent uosteuropas 3（1959），152 ff

[39]cfthe llection of texts splapros，4 vols，athens 1912-30the iportant new edition of gscholari by epetit，hasiderides and jugie，paris 1928 ff，is not aessible to

[40]edgyoravcsik，1，budapest 1935

[41]ed．heibach，leipzig 1851on the oasion of the 600 th anniversary of the hexabiblos the law faculty of the university of thessalonica publi射d a nuber of iportant historical and legal papers theirυ，thessalonica 1951

[42]edrhalles and potles，6，athens 1859;serbian transedstnovakovic，atije vlastara stagat（the syntaga of atthew blastares），belgrade 1907

[43]cfespecially fdolr，a den s插tzkarn des heil bers，unich 1948;plerle，actes de kut，paris 1945;aguillou，les archives de sat-jean-prodro sur le ont énécée，paris 1955;fdolr，sechs byzant