第231頁(第1/5 頁)

[34]rguilland，&l;le traitéédit｀sur l&r;ure&r;de nilas cabasilas&r;，（1935），269-77;igne，pg 150，727-50on this cfzakythos，crise onétaire 120 ff

[35]until recently，this work was only known the for of extracts publi射d by tafrali，thessalonie，261 ffit is now available full the edition by isevcenko，&l;nilas cabasilas&r;&ldo;anti-zealot&rdo;disursea reterpretation&r;，dop 11（1957），81-171，who al akes it the subject of an iportant study which goes deep to the probles of byzante cial historysevcenko shows that cabasilas&r;disurse was not written agast the rule of the zealots thessalonica as was previoly supposed，but agast the iperial governnt&r;s asures of secularization for ilitary purposes，ieby grantg onastic lands pronoia a further article he exaes a nuber of texts fro the sparis gr1276，which see to represent the earlier redactions of the work with rrections and additions cabasilas&r;own hand：isevcenko，&l;the author&r;s draft of nilas cabasilas&r;&ldo;anti-zealot&rdo;disurse paris graec 1276&r;，dop 14（1960）179 ffsce by rean of its waterarks this st be dated to the later decades of the fourteenth century，cabasilas&r;disurse was not produced the fifth decade of this century，as sevcenko had believed his first article，and nseently was not directed agast the governnt of anne of savoy but agast the very extensive alienations of onastic properties and their distribution to pronoiars after the battle of arica 1371，which sees uch ore nvcg（see below，p541）