第64頁(第2/4 頁)

y，&l;chronologie&r;）stkyriakides，&l;，thessalonica 1953，5 ff，has publi射d the edict a lecture on the representation of the triuphal entry of jtian 2 the church of stdetri（cfal vasiliev cited above）on this representation cfal kantorowicz，&r;the kg&r;s advent&r;，the art bullet 26（1944），216，note 63，and for another view jdbreckenrid，&l;the long sie of thessalonica&r;，bz 48（1955），116 ff

[108]theophanes 364，15an terestg lead seal nnected with this igration of the slaves is publi射d by pancenko，pajatnik slavjan v vifii&r;（evidence of the slavs bithynia），izvrskarcheolstv k/le 8（1902），15 ffon the obverse the lend runsand on the reverse，as anded by gschberr，bz 12（1903），277，（sic）the seal can therefore be dated 694/5（diction 8）and the eperor represented on it would th be jtian 2it belond to the iperial official who was placed as adistrator over the slav ldiers settled bithynia and who had the title of ankulakovskij，istorija 3，360，had already sugsted assigng it to jtian，and had shown that pancenko&r;s datg to the year 650 was based on false hypotheseskulakovskij is however wrong placg the seal the year 710/11（ore rrectly 709/10）；the youthful appearance of the eperor pots agast this，and addition the period of his send reign jtian is ually found represented with his n and -eperor tiberi（cfwroth，byzs 2，354 ffand plxli）p插ranis，&l;the slavic elent byzante asia or&r;，b 18（1948），70，returns to pancenko&r;s datg of 650，becae，stranly enough，he takes at its face vae the report of theoph