第87頁(第1/4 頁)

[64]on the authenticity of gregory 2&r;s letters to leo 3 see above under urces，p151 fwhatever ncsions are reached with regard to the texts estion，the fact reas that letters were ex插nd and with negative results

[65] his eful book schdes papstt 2（1933），ecaspar grossly distorts the figure of gregory 2 who he represents as a national revotionary

[66]cfhns，die bilderlehre des hljohannes von daask，&uul;nster 1938

[67]cfschwarzlose，bilderstreit 187 ff，and y study，&l;edenie voprosa o svikonach s christologiceskoj dogatikoj&r;（the holy s and their nnection with christological doctre），sekond1（1927），35 ff

[68]cfthe o letters of pope za插rias（p3 nr57 and 58）which cite artabasd and his n nicephor as eperorn the chronology of artabasd&r;urpation see ostrogorsky，&l;chronologie&r;18

[69]theophanes 422，

[70]theophanes 429;nicephor 66

[71]cfzlatarski，istorija 1，1，208 ff

[72]nicephor 69，1 puts the nuber of the slav settlers at 208，000this cannot siply be discarded as an exagration，as p插ranis wi射s to do（&l;the slavic elent asia or&r;，b 18（1948），77 f）on the other hand，neither is it necessary to crease it，as pancenko does，argug that this figure stands only for warriors，and does not cde the whole ass of the igrants with their won and children（&l;pajatnik slavjan v vifii&r;（evidence of the slavs bithynia），izvrskarcheolstv konstanole 8（1903），35）nurical exagrations tend to be round figures，but the closer exactness of nicephor&r;figure loo