第124頁(第1/4 頁)

[33]cfthe regulations which the tetarteron is ntioned，which caed stockle，z&uul;nfte，to place the redaction of the book of the eparch the ti of nicephor 2 phocas;cfal kubitschek，nuzeitschr44（1911），185 ffchrishilopulos，22，disisses these passas too lightlyickwitz，z&uul;nfte 205 and bnj 12（1936），368 ff，rightly nsiders they were supplentary rulgsrslopez，&l;la crise du besant au xe siècle et la date du livre du préfet&r;，élans grégoire 2（1950），403 ff，nsiders there were even additions fro the ti of john i tziisces，sce as well as references to the，whose troduction scylitzes attributes to nicephor phocas，theis found，a type of belongg to john tziisces&r;periodcfbelow，p293，note 1，for further bibliography on the estion of the tetarteron

[34]first edby washburner，jhs 35（1915），76 ff；a later and revised edby dolr， fanzverwaltung，with detailed study;ran transand study ostrogorsky，&l;steuerde&r;dolr，fanzverwaltung 8，places the treatise the period beeen 913 and 1139as agast this i attept to show，opcit3 ff，and recueil kondakov（1926），109 ff，that it probably appeared under nstante 7，and any case before 1002;this view is shared by ost scholarscffor exaple ste，&l;vo altertu&r;，158 ff；andreades，bz 28（1928），292 ff；nstantescu，&l;la unautéde villa byzant et ses rapports avec le petit traitéfiscal byzant&r;，bullet de la section histde l&r;acadrouae 13（1927），160 ff，and deutsche literaturzeitung 1928，l1619 ff；lerle，&l;histoire agraire&r;，257 ff；ka