第132頁(第2/4 頁)

f several novels（za插ria，j 3，234，n1） fact on closer exaation i a forced to the ncsion that c2 is not entirely agreent with ci，the a part of the novel，but represents a further sta the legislation（gifts and legacies favour of the&l;powerful&r;which are not dealt with as such by the protisis order are expressly forbidden c2）th lerle is right ephasizg the need for a critical exaation of the extant text of this novel-and likewise of the other novels aid at the protection of the sall property-owner-and sistg that a fresh study of this entire group of novels is an urnt desideratubut it would be takg scepticis too far to doubt that this novel，with its basic provisions ncerng the law of protisis，es fro roan 1za插ria，schichte，238 ff，265 ff，etc，was certaly right regardg this&l;ber&uul;hte und f&uul;r alle folzeit assbende novelle&r;as without estion- spite of his note ntioned above-the law of roan i fro the year 922the date-april of the tenth diction the year 6430（922）-is deed first given later law booksth although it is not pletely certa that it is rrect，there is on the other hand no good rean for rejectg it，sce its diction nuber and year rrespond exactly

a critical edition and textual study of this group of novels should shortly be publi射d by nsvoronos，as announced his unication to the Ⅻth byzante ngress at ochrida（1961）。

[163]cfostrogorsky，&l;steuerde&r;32 ff

[164]as is iplied by note 1 above，this provision was probably added later to the protisis novel，w