第88頁(第2/4 頁)

t of 25 deceber 800 cannot be expned as the oute of the situation of the ont without greatly oversiplifyg the proble

[101]cfthe bibliography at the begng of this 插ptera different view is taken by lhalphen，插rleagne et l&r;epire carolgien，paris，1947，120 ff

[102]theophanes 475，27on this uch discsed passa cfwohnr，&l;orthodox iperatorvo religiosen otiv f&uul;r das kaisertu karls des grossen&r;，jahrbdsells插ft fniedersachskirchensch48（1950），24 ff，whose stiulatg，but oversubtle，argunts on 插rles&r;position with regard to the estion of s i cannot however aeptcfy nts bz 46（1953），153 ff，especially p155

[103]the onk theosterict praises hi as，vita nicetae，aass，1 april，pxxix

[104]theophanes 486-7

[105]theophnt54dolr，fanzverwaltung 62 ff，and nanstantescu，bullet de l&r;acadrouae，section hist11（1924）and deutsche literaturzeitung 1928，heft 31，l161 ff，thk that only serfs paid the kapnikon，although this is ntradicted theophnt54 and al scylitzes-cedren 2，413 and ibn hordadbeh（edde goeje），84cfy nts b 6（1931），234 f，and&l;steuerde&r;，49 ff，and al ste，&l;vo altertu&r;160dolr，bz 34（1934），371 ff，still atas his view

[106]theophanes 486，26，dolr，fanzverwaltung 130 and bz 36（1936），158 with note 1，denies that the expression had a technical significance，though he would be cled to ake an exception the case of the allelengyon of basil 2he is now followed by lerle，&l;histoire agraire&r;，261 ffbut the ashburner treatise§14（=dolr，fanzverwaltung，119，24）shows that i