第236頁(第3/4 頁)

the capture of didyotich to 1360，and of adrianople to 1361，but this sees to ipossible view of the urces jt otedrjloenertz，&l;etudes sur les chronies brèves byzantes&r;，ocp 24（1958）155 ff，now actually places the fall of adrianople the year 1360（p159），basg his view on a veian chronicle and on the short chronicle lapros-aantos，no36but both urces obvioly nta errors and nfionsloenertz hiself notes this with respect to the short chronicle no36;with regard to the veian urce cfthe observations of scirkovic snovakovic，srbi i turci x6 i xv veka（serbs and turks the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries），belgrade 1960，445 fthe sugstion of aburov，&l;koga e zavladjan odr ot turcite?&r;（when was adrianople captured by the turks?）izvna bu。lgistordruzestvo 21（1945），23 ff，that adrianople did not fall until after the battle of the arica 1371，is wide of the arkthis sugstion，which is larly based on later serbian urces，is rightly rejected by tichirov，voprosy istorii 1948，691 fand babr，reb 7（1950），205

[173]cfbabr，beitra 48 ff

[174]cfnikov，&l;turskoto zavladevane&r;（the turkish nest），46 ff；babr，beitra 48 f，57 ff

[175]aordg to nikov，&l;turskoto zavladevane&r;55 ff

[176]this is ade clear fro the text recently publi射d by jyendorff ntioned the note that follows

[177]cfjyendorff，&l;projet de ncile decuénie en 1367;un dialogue édit entre jean cantacuzène et le légat paul&r;，dop 14（1960），147-77，who akes known a nteporary aount of the